↓ Skip to main content

Biomechanics and biomimetics in insect-inspired flight systems

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
243 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biomechanics and biomimetics in insect-inspired flight systems
Published in
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, September 2016
DOI 10.1098/rstb.2015.0390
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hao Liu, Sridhar Ravi, Dmitry Kolomenskiy, Hiroto Tanaka

Abstract

Insect- and bird-size drones-micro air vehicles (MAV) that can perform autonomous flight in natural and man-made environments are now an active and well-integrated research area. MAVs normally operate at a low speed in a Reynolds number regime of 10(4)-10(5) or lower, in which most flying animals of insects, birds and bats fly, and encounter unconventional challenges in generating sufficient aerodynamic forces to stay airborne and in controlling flight autonomy to achieve complex manoeuvres. Flying insects that power and control flight by flapping wings are capable of sophisticated aerodynamic force production and precise, agile manoeuvring, through an integrated system consisting of wings to generate aerodynamic force, muscles to move the wings and a control system to modulate power output from the muscles. In this article, we give a selective review on the state of the art of biomechanics in bioinspired flight systems in terms of flapping and flexible wing aerodynamics, flight dynamics and stability, passive and active mechanisms in stabilization and control, as well as flapping flight in unsteady environments. We further highlight recent advances in biomimetics of flapping-wing MAVs with a specific focus on insect-inspired wing design and fabrication, as well as sensing systems.This article is part of the themed issue 'Moving in a moving medium: new perspectives on flight'.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 241 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 19%
Student > Master 41 17%
Student > Bachelor 27 11%
Researcher 26 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 28 12%
Unknown 58 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 109 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 12%
Physics and Astronomy 6 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Environmental Science 5 2%
Other 28 12%
Unknown 62 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#6,572,428
of 25,805,386 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#3,756
of 7,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,310
of 332,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#73
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,805,386 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.3. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.