↓ Skip to main content

Joint IARC/NCI International Cancer Seminar Series Report: expert consensus on future directions for ovarian carcinoma research

Overview of attention for article published in Carcinogenesis, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Joint IARC/NCI International Cancer Seminar Series Report: expert consensus on future directions for ovarian carcinoma research
Published in
Carcinogenesis, May 2021
DOI 10.1093/carcin/bgab043
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shama Virani, Glauco Baiocchi, David Bowtell, Citadel J Cabasag, Kathleen R Cho, Renée T Fortner, Keiichi Fujiwara, Jae-Weon Kim, Martin Köbel, Jean-Emmanuel Kurtz, Douglas A Levine, Usha Menon, Barbara M Norquist, Paul D P Pharoah, Anil K Sood, Shelley T Tworoger, Nicolas Wentzensen, Stephen J Chanock, Paul Brennan, Britton Trabert

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 13%
Librarian 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 7 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 27%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2023.
All research outputs
#6,670,602
of 24,527,525 outputs
Outputs from Carcinogenesis
#1,566
of 4,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,032
of 438,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Carcinogenesis
#7
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,527,525 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,872 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.