Cluster of differentiation 33 single nucleotide polymorphism rs12459419 is a predictive factor in patients with nucleophosmin1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia receiving gemtuzumab ozogamicin

Overview of attention for article published in Haematologica, May 2021

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 10 X users

Readers on

mendeley: 9 Mendeley

You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Article details
Title	Cluster of differentiation 33 single nucleotide polymorphism rs12459419 is a predictive factor in patients with <i>nucleophosmin1</i>-mutated acute myeloid leukemia receiving gemtuzumab ozogamicin
Published in	Haematologica, May 2021
DOI	10.3324/haematol.2021.278894
Pubmed ID	34047179
Authors	Katrin Teich, Julia Krzykalla, Silke Kapp-Schwoerer, Verena I. Gaidzik, Richard F. Schlenk, Peter Paschka, Daniela Weber, Walter Fiedler, Michael W. M. Kühn, Thomas Schroeder, Karin Mayer, Michael Lübbert, Dhanya Ramachandran, Axel Benner, Arnold Ganser, Hartmut Döhner, Michael Heuser, Konstanze Döhner, Felicitas Thol

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline

Activity

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
Spain	2	20%
Cuba	1	10%
United States	1	10%
Italy	1	10%
Unknown	5	50%

Demographic breakdown

Type
Type	Count	As %
Members of the public	8	80%
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)	1	10%
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)	1	10%

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
Unknown	9	100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Researcher	3	33%
Student > Ph. D. Student	2	22%
Student > Bachelor	1	11%
Unknown	3	33%

Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science	1	11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology	1	11%
Mathematics	1	11%
Medicine and Dentistry	1	11%
Neuroscience	1	11%
Other	0	0%
Unknown	4	44%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2021.

All research outputs

#6,040,409

of 27,790,740 outputs

Outputs from Haematologica

#1,420

of 4,893 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#126,414

of 467,879 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Haematologica

#25

of 67 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 27,790,740 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 4,893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 467,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.