↓ Skip to main content

Hands only illusion: multisensory integration elicits sense of ownership for body parts but not for non-corporeal objects

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
287 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
355 Mendeley
Title
Hands only illusion: multisensory integration elicits sense of ownership for body parts but not for non-corporeal objects
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, October 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00221-009-2039-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manos Tsakiris, Lewis Carpenter, Dafydd James, Aikaterini Fotopoulou

Abstract

The experience of body ownership can be successfully manipulated during the rubber hand illusion using synchronous multisensory stimulation. The hypothesis that multisensory integration is both a necessary and sufficient condition for body ownership is debated. We systematically varied the appearance of the object that was stimulated in synchrony or asynchrony with the participant's hand. A viewed object that was transformed in three stages from a plain wooden block to a wooden hand was compared to a realistic rubber hand. Introspective and behavioural results show that participants experience a sense of ownership only for the realistic prosthetic hand, suggesting that not all objects can be experienced as part of one's body. Instead, the viewed object must fit with a reference model of the body that contains important structural information about body parts. This body model can distinguish between corporeal and non-corporeal objects, and it therefore plays a critical role in maintaining a coherent sense of one's body.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 1%
Spain 4 1%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Canada 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 331 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 22%
Researcher 54 15%
Student > Master 49 14%
Student > Bachelor 35 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 8%
Other 59 17%
Unknown 51 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 142 40%
Neuroscience 39 11%
Computer Science 27 8%
Engineering 25 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 4%
Other 40 11%
Unknown 67 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2022.
All research outputs
#6,917,125
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#795
of 3,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,434
of 93,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.