| Title |
Clinical utility and applicability of biomarker-based diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer’s disease: a BeDeCo survey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Neurologica Belgica, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13760-014-0423-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jean-Christophe Bier, Jurn Verschraegen, Rik Vandenberghe, Bénédicte Guillaume, Gaëtane Picard, Georges Otte, Eric Mormont, Christian Gilles, Kurt Segers, Anne Sieben, Evert Thiery, Manfredi Ventura, Peter De Deyn, Olivier Deryck, Jan Versijpt, Eric Salmon, Sebastiaan Engelborghs, Adrian Ivanoiu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 33 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 15% |
| Professor | 4 | 12% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 13 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 6 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 13 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,907,830
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neurologica Belgica
#334
of 809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,701
of 359,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neurologica Belgica
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.