↓ Skip to main content

TREM2 Variants in Alzheimer's Disease

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
2364 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2076 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
TREM2 Variants in Alzheimer's Disease
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, November 2012
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1211851
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rita Guerreiro, Aleksandra Wojtas, Jose Bras, Minerva Carrasquillo, Ekaterina Rogaeva, Elisa Majounie, Carlos Cruchaga, Celeste Sassi, John S K Kauwe, Steven Younkin, Lilinaz Hazrati, John Collinge, Jennifer Pocock, Tammaryn Lashley, Julie Williams, Jean-Charles Lambert, Philippe Amouyel, Alison Goate, Rosa Rademakers, Kevin Morgan, John Powell, Peter St George-Hyslop, Andrew Singleton, John Hardy

Abstract

Homozygous loss-of-function mutations in TREM2, encoding the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 protein, have previously been associated with an autosomal recessive form of early-onset dementia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,076 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 22 1%
United Kingdom 15 <1%
Spain 9 <1%
Germany 5 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 10 <1%
Unknown 2007 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 414 20%
Researcher 333 16%
Student > Bachelor 277 13%
Student > Master 219 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 92 4%
Other 297 14%
Unknown 444 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 407 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 387 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 264 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 239 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 50 2%
Other 209 10%
Unknown 520 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 275. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2024.
All research outputs
#131,946
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#3,012
of 32,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#547
of 195,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#18
of 378 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 378 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.