You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
TREM2 Variants in Alzheimer's Disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, November 2012
|
DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa1211851 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rita Guerreiro, Aleksandra Wojtas, Jose Bras, Minerva Carrasquillo, Ekaterina Rogaeva, Elisa Majounie, Carlos Cruchaga, Celeste Sassi, John S K Kauwe, Steven Younkin, Lilinaz Hazrati, John Collinge, Jennifer Pocock, Tammaryn Lashley, Julie Williams, Jean-Charles Lambert, Philippe Amouyel, Alison Goate, Rosa Rademakers, Kevin Morgan, John Powell, Peter St George-Hyslop, Andrew Singleton, John Hardy |
Abstract |
Homozygous loss-of-function mutations in TREM2, encoding the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 protein, have previously been associated with an autosomal recessive form of early-onset dementia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 22 | 33% |
France | 5 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 7% |
Ecuador | 2 | 3% |
Mexico | 2 | 3% |
Spain | 2 | 3% |
Uzbekistan | 1 | 1% |
Japan | 1 | 1% |
Luxembourg | 1 | 1% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Unknown | 23 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 42 | 63% |
Scientists | 14 | 21% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 12% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,067 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 22 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 15 | <1% |
Spain | 9 | <1% |
Germany | 5 | <1% |
Japan | 2 | <1% |
Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Other | 10 | <1% |
Unknown | 1998 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 413 | 20% |
Researcher | 333 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 276 | 13% |
Student > Master | 220 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 92 | 4% |
Other | 302 | 15% |
Unknown | 431 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 406 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 387 | 19% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 265 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 239 | 12% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 51 | 2% |
Other | 212 | 10% |
Unknown | 507 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 275. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2024.
All research outputs
#130,481
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#2,994
of 32,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#543
of 192,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#19
of 378 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,519 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 378 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.