You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
JCS/JHRS 2019 Guideline on Non-Pharmacotherapy of Cardiac Arrhythmias
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation Journal, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1253/circj.cj-20-0637 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Akihiko Nogami, Takashi Kurita, Haruhiko Abe, Kenji Ando, Toshiyuki Ishikawa, Katsuhiko Imai, Akihiko Usui, Kaoru Okishige, Kengo Kusano, Koichiro Kumagai, Masahiko Goya, Yoshinori Kobayashi, Akihiko Shimizu, Wataru Shimizu, Morio Shoda, Naokata Sumitomo, Yoshihiro Seo, Atsushi Takahashi, Hiroshi Tada, Shigeto Naito, Yuji Nakazato, Takashi Nishimura, Takashi Nitta, Shinichi Niwano, Nobuhisa Hagiwara, Yuji Murakawa, Teiichi Yamane, Takeshi Aiba, Koichi Inoue, Yuki Iwasaki, Yasuya Inden, Kikuya Uno, Michio Ogano, Masaomi Kimura, Shun-ichiro Sakamoto, Shingo Sasaki, Kazuhiro Satomi, Tsuyoshi Shiga, Tsugutoshi Suzuki, Yukio Sekiguchi, Kyoko Soejima, Masahiko Takagi, Masaomi Chinushi, Nobuhiro Nishi, Takashi Noda, Hitoshi Hachiya, Masataka Mitsuno, Takeshi Mitsuhashi, Yasushi Miyauchi, Aya Miyazaki, Tomoshige Morimoto, Hiro Yamasaki, Yoshifusa Aizawa, Tohru Ohe, Takeshi Kimura, Kazuo Tanemoto, Hiroyuki Tsutsui, Hideo Mitamura, on behalf of the JCS/JHRS Joint Working Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 6 | 38% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Haiti | 1 | 6% |
| China | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 81% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 16% |
| Unknown | 5 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 53% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2021.
All research outputs
#3,191,321
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#134
of 2,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,371
of 459,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#7
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.