You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification of the BCAR1-CFDP1-TMEM170A Locus as a Determinant of Carotid Intima-Media Thickness and Coronary Artery Disease Risk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1161/circgenetics.112.963660 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karl Gertow, Bengt Sennblad, Rona J Strawbridge, John Ohrvik, Delilah Zabaneh, Sonia Shah, Fabrizio Veglia, Cristiano Fava, Maryam Kavousi, Stela McLachlan, Mika Kivimäki, Jennifer L Bolton, Lasse Folkersen, Bruna Gigante, Karin Leander, Max Vikström, Malin Larsson, Angela Silveira, John Deanfield, Benjamin F Voight, Pierre Fontanillas, Maria Sabater-Lleal, Gualtiero I Colombo, Meena Kumari, Claudia Langenberg, Nick J Wareham, André G Uitterlinden, Anders Gabrielsen, Ulf Hedin, Anders Franco-Cereceda, Kristiina Nyyssönen, Rainer Rauramaa, Tomi-Pekka Tuomainen, Kai Savonen, Andries J Smit, Philippe Giral, Elmo Mannarino, Christine M Robertson, Philippa J Talmud, Bo Hedblad, Albert Hofman, Jeanette Erdmann, Muredach P Reilly, Christopher J O'Donnell, Martin Farrall, Robert Clarke, Maria Grazia Franzosi, Udo Seedorf, Ann-Christine Syvänen, Göran K Hansson, Per Eriksson, Nilesh J Samani, Hugh Watkins, Jacqueline F Price, Aroon D Hingorani, Olle Melander, Jacqueline C M Witteman, Damiano Baldassarre, Elena Tremoli, Ulf de Faire, Steve E Humphries, Anders Hamsten |
| Abstract |
Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) is a widely accepted marker of subclinical atherosclerosis. To date, large-scale investigations of genetic determinants of cIMT are sparse. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 20% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 25% |
| Unknown | 15 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 11% |
| Psychology | 8 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 18 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2012.
All research outputs
#22,793,536
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
#996
of 1,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,132
of 192,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
#14
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.