Title |
Caring for Pregnant Women with Opioid Use Disorder in the USA: Expanding and Improving Treatment
|
---|---|
Published in |
Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports, July 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s13669-016-0168-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kelley A. Saia, Davida Schiff, Elisha M. Wachman, Pooja Mehta, Annmarie Vilkins, Michelle Sia, Jordana Price, Tirah Samura, Justin DeAngelis, Clark V. Jackson, Sawyer F. Emmer, Daniel Shaw, Sarah Bagley |
Abstract |
Opioid use disorder in the USA is rising at an alarming rate, particularly among women of childbearing age. Pregnant women with opioid use disorder face numerous barriers to care, including limited access to treatment, stigma, and fear of legal consequences. This review of opioid use disorder in pregnancy is designed to assist health care providers caring for pregnant and postpartum women with the goal of expanding evidence-based treatment practices for this vulnerable population. We review current literature on opioid use disorder among US women, existing legislation surrounding substance use in pregnancy, and available treatment options for pregnant women with opioid use disorder. Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) remains the standard of care for treating opioid use disorder in pregnancy. Medically assisted opioid withdrawal ("detoxification") is not recommended in pregnancy and is associated with high maternal relapse rates. Extended release naltrexone may confer benefit for carefully selected patients. Histories of trauma and mental health disorders are prevalent in this population; and best practice recommendations incorporate gender-specific, trauma-informed, mental health services. Breastfeeding with OAT is safe and beneficial for the mother-infant dyad. Further research investigating options of OAT and the efficacy of opioid antagonists in pregnancy is needed. The US health care system can adapt to provide quality care for these mother-infant dyads by expanding comprehensive treatment services and improving access to care. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 15 | 56% |
Belarus | 1 | 4% |
Colombia | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 10 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 20 | 74% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 11% |
Scientists | 3 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 189 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 33 | 17% |
Researcher | 25 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
Other | 33 | 17% |
Unknown | 45 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 41 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 21% |
Social Sciences | 20 | 11% |
Psychology | 12 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
Other | 19 | 10% |
Unknown | 53 | 28% |