| Title |
Identifying safe care processes when GPs work in or alongside emergency departments: realist evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp.2021.0090 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alison Cooper, Andrew Carson-Stevens, Michelle Edwards, Freya Davies, Liam J Donaldson, Pippa Anderson, Matthew Cooke, Jeremy Dale, Bridie Angela Evans, Barbara Harrington, Julie Hepburn, Peter Hibbert, Thomas Hughes, Alison Porter, Aloysius Niroshan Siriwardena, Helen Snooks, Adrian Edwards |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 19 | 73% |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 19% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 50% |
| Scientists | 7 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 23% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 16 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 6 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 17 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,975,913
of 24,464,848 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#967
of 4,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,844
of 438,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#37
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,464,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.