↓ Skip to main content

Changes in blood lymphocyte numbers with age in vivo and their association with the levels of cytokines/cytokine receptors

Overview of attention for article published in Immunity & Ageing, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Changes in blood lymphocyte numbers with age in vivo and their association with the levels of cytokines/cytokine receptors
Published in
Immunity & Ageing, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12979-016-0079-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yun Lin, Jiewan Kim, E. Jeffrey Metter, Huy Nguyen, Thai Truong, Ana Lustig, Luigi Ferrucci, Nan-ping Weng

Abstract

Alterations in the number and composition of lymphocytes and their subsets in blood are considered a hallmark of immune system aging. However, it is unknown whether the rates of change of lymphocytes are stable or change with age, or whether the inter-individual variations of lymphocyte composition are stable over time or undergo different rates of change at different ages. Here, we report a longitudinal analysis of T- and B-cells and their subsets, and NK cells in the blood of 165 subjects aged from 24 to 90 years, with each subject assessed at baseline and an average of 5.6 years follow-up. The rates of change of T-(CD4(+) and CD8(+)) and B-cells, and NK cells were relative stable throughout the adult life. A great degree of individual variations in numbers of lymphocytes and their subsets and in the rates of their changes with age was observed. Among them, CD4(+) T cells exhibited the highest degree of individual variation followed by NK cells, CD8(+) T cells, and B cells. Different types of lymphocytes had distinct trends in their rates of change which did not appear to be influenced by CMV infection. Finally, the rates of CD4(+), CD8(+) T cells, naive CD4(+) and naïve CD8(+) T cells were closely positively correlated. Our findings provide evidence that the age-associated changes in circulating lymphocytes were at relative stable rates in vivo in a highly individualized manner and the levels of selected cytokines/cytokine receptors in serum might influence these age-associated changes of lymphocytes in circulation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 101 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 39 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 8%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 48 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2016.
All research outputs
#13,241,793
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Immunity & Ageing
#181
of 374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,348
of 343,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunity & Ageing
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.