| Title |
Implementing social prescribing in primary care in areas of high socioeconomic deprivation: process evaluation of the ‘Deep End’ community links worker programme
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp.2020.1153 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nai Rui Chng, Katie Hawkins, Bridie Fitzpatrick, Catherine A O’Donnell, Mhairi Mackenzie, Sally Wyke, Stewart W Mercer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 39 | 60% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 49% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 29% |
| Scientists | 13 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 36 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 10 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 37 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2022.
All research outputs
#819,037
of 23,575,346 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#364
of 4,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,817
of 446,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#13
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,575,346 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.