↓ Skip to main content

Testing for ROS1 in non-small cell lung cancer: a review with recommendations

Overview of attention for article published in Virchows Archiv, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 1,951)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
17 X users
patent
7 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
190 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
Title
Testing for ROS1 in non-small cell lung cancer: a review with recommendations
Published in
Virchows Archiv, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00428-016-2000-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lukas Bubendorf, Reinhard Büttner, Fouad Al-Dayel, Manfred Dietel, Göran Elmberger, Keith Kerr, Fernando López-Ríos, Antonio Marchetti, Büge Öz, Patrick Pauwels, Frédérique Penault-Llorca, Giulio Rossi, Aleš Ryška, Erik Thunnissen

Abstract

Rearrangements of the ROS1 gene occur in 1-2 % of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Crizotinib, a highly effective inhibitor of ROS1 kinase activity, is now FDA-approved for the treatment of patients with advanced ROS1-positive NSCLC. Consequently, focus on ROS1 testing is growing. Most laboratories currently rely on fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) assays using a dual-colour break-apart probe to detect ROS1 rearrangements. Given the rarity of these rearrangements in NSCLC, detection of elevated ROS1 protein levels by immunohistochemistry may provide cost-effective screening prior to confirmatory FISH testing. Non-in situ testing approaches also hold potential as stand-alone methods or complementary tests, including multiplex real-time PCR assays and next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms which include commercial test kits covering a range of fusion genes. In order to ensure high-quality biomarker testing, appropriate tissue handling, adequate control materials and participation in external quality assessment programmes are essential, irrespective of the testing technique employed. ROS1 testing is often only considered after negative tests for EGFR mutation and ALK gene rearrangement, based on the assumption that these oncogenic driver events tend to be exclusive. However, as the use of ROS1 inhibitors becomes routine, accurate and timely detection of ROS1 gene rearrangements will be critical for the optimal treatment of patients with NSCLC. As NGS techniques are introduced into routine diagnostic practice, ROS1 fusion gene testing will be provided as part of the initial testing package.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 206 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 30 14%
Researcher 25 12%
Student > Master 24 12%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 9%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 57 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 2%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 66 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,098,283
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Virchows Archiv
#20
of 1,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,072
of 342,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virchows Archiv
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,951 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.