| Title |
Compensation for spill-in and spill-out partial volume effects in cardiac PET imaging
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12350-012-9649-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yong Du, Igal Madar, Martin J. Stumpf, Xing Rong, George S.K. Fung, Eric C. Frey |
| Abstract |
Partial volume effects (PVEs) in PET imaging result in incorrect regional activity estimates due to both spill-out and spill-in from activity in neighboring regions. It is important to compensate for both effects to achieve accurate quantification. In this study, an image-based partial volume compensation (PVC) method was developed and validated for cardiac PET. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 26 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 19% |
| Unknown | 4 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 26% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 22% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 11% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 3 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2012.
All research outputs
#16,579,551
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#1,200
of 2,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,416
of 192,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#9
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,044 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.