↓ Skip to main content

Moderate Pulmonary Embolism Treated With Thrombolysis (from the “MOPETT” Trial)

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Cardiology, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 10,349)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
466 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
552 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Moderate Pulmonary Embolism Treated With Thrombolysis (from the “MOPETT” Trial)
Published in
American Journal of Cardiology, October 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.09.027
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohsen Sharifi, Curt Bay, Laura Skrocki, Farnoosh Rahimi, Mahshid Mehdipour, “MOPETT” Investigators

Abstract

The role of low-dose thrombolysis in the reduction of pulmonary artery pressure in moderate pulmonary embolism (PE) has not been investigated. Because the lungs are very sensitive to thrombolysis, we postulated that effective and safe thrombolysis might be achieved by a lower dose of tissue plasminogen activator. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the role of this "safe dose" thrombolysis in the reduction of pulmonary artery pressure in moderate PE. During a 22-month period, 121 patients with moderate PE were randomized to receive a "safe dose" of tissue plasminogen activator plus anticoagulation (thrombolysis group [TG], n = 61 patients) or anticoagulation alone (control group [CG], n = 60). The primary end points consisted of pulmonary hypertension and the composite end point of pulmonary hypertension and recurrent PE at 28 months. Pulmonary hypertension and the composite end point developed in 9 of 58 patients (16%) in the TG and 32 of 56 patients (57%) in the CG (p <0.001) and 9 of 58 patients (16%) in the TG and 35 of 56 patients (63%) in the CG (p <0.001), respectively. The secondary end points were total mortality, the duration of hospital stay, bleeding at the index hospitalization, recurrent PE, and the combination of mortality and recurrent PE. The duration of hospitalization was 2.2 ± 0.5 days in the TG and 4.9 ± 0.8 days in the CG (p <0.001). The combination of death plus recurrent PE was 1 (1.6%) in TG and 6 (10%) in the CG (p = 0.0489). No bleeding occurred in any group, and despite a positive trend in favor of a "safe dose" thrombolysis, no significant difference was noted in the rate of individual outcomes of death and recurrent PE when assessed independently. In conclusion, the results from the present prospective randomized trial suggests that "safe dose" thrombolysis is safe and effective in the treatment of moderate PE, with a significant immediate reduction in the pulmonary artery pressure that was maintained at 28 months.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 92 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 552 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 539 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 118 21%
Student > Postgraduate 79 14%
Researcher 60 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 7%
Student > Master 36 7%
Other 123 22%
Unknown 95 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 379 69%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 1%
Other 17 3%
Unknown 106 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 146. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2024.
All research outputs
#286,578
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Cardiology
#50
of 10,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,453
of 204,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Cardiology
#2
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,349 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.