↓ Skip to main content

Cognitive reserve and cortical thickness in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Imaging and Behavior, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
Title
Cognitive reserve and cortical thickness in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease
Published in
Brain Imaging and Behavior, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11682-016-9581-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Corinne Pettigrew, Anja Soldan, Yuxin Zhu, Mei-Cheng Wang, Timothy Brown, Michael Miller, Marilyn Albert, the BIOCARD Research Team

Abstract

This study examined whether cognitive reserve (CR) alters the relationship between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures of cortical thickness and risk of progression from normal cognition to the onset of clinical symptoms associated with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The analyses included 232 participants from the BIOCARD study. Participants were cognitively normal and largely middle aged (M age = 56.5) at their baseline MRI scan. After an average of 11.8 years of longitudinal follow-up, 48 have developed clinical symptoms of MCI or dementia (M time from baseline to clinical symptom onset = 7.0 years). Mean thickness was measured over eight 'AD vulnerable' cortical regions, and cognitive reserve was indexed by a composite score consisting of years of education, reading, and vocabulary measures. Using Cox regression models, CR and cortical thickness were each independently associated with risk of clinical symptom onset within 7 years of baseline, suggesting that the neuronal injury occurring proximal to symptom onset has a direct association with clinical outcomes, regardless of CR. In contrast, there was a significant interaction between CR and mean cortical thickness for risk of progression more than 7 years from baseline, suggesting that individuals with high CR are better able to compensate for cortical thinning that is beginning to occur at the very earliest phase of AD.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 105 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Other 11 10%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 22 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 25 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 12%
Neuroscience 12 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 32 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#4,191,804
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#234
of 1,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,235
of 343,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#5
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.