Title |
A qualitative investigation into women's experiences after a miscarriage: implications for the primary healthcare team.
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, September 2003
|
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Michael K Wong, Trevor J Crawford, Linda Gask, Anne Grinyer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Rwanda | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 81 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 22% |
Student > Master | 14 | 17% |
Researcher | 8 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
Other | 14 | 17% |
Unknown | 14 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 30% |
Psychology | 20 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 16% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Unknown | 14 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,196,862
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#549
of 4,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,100
of 53,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them