You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Mobilisation with movement and exercise, corticosteroid injection, or wait and see for tennis elbow: randomised trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Medical Journal, September 2006
|
DOI | 10.1136/bmj.38961.584653.ae |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Leanne Bisset, Elaine Beller, Gwendolen Jull, Peter Brooks, Ross Darnell, Bill Vicenzino |
Abstract |
To investigate the efficacy of physiotherapy compared with a wait and see approach or corticosteroid injections over 52 weeks in tennis elbow. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 25 | 30% |
United Kingdom | 9 | 11% |
Australia | 9 | 11% |
United States | 5 | 6% |
France | 2 | 2% |
India | 2 | 2% |
Ireland | 2 | 2% |
Canada | 2 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 25 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 68 | 81% |
Scientists | 10 | 12% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 5% |
Unknown | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 968 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
France | 3 | <1% |
Spain | 3 | <1% |
Belgium | 3 | <1% |
Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Germany | 2 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Other | 6 | <1% |
Unknown | 937 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 148 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 125 | 13% |
Other | 124 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 92 | 10% |
Researcher | 81 | 8% |
Other | 206 | 21% |
Unknown | 192 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 440 | 45% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 153 | 16% |
Sports and Recreations | 63 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 13 | 1% |
Other | 63 | 7% |
Unknown | 221 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2024.
All research outputs
#457,147
of 25,528,120 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#5,379
of 64,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#641
of 88,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#9
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,528,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.