↓ Skip to main content

Mobilisation with movement and exercise, corticosteroid injection, or wait and see for tennis elbow: randomised trial

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, September 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
84 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
31 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
441 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
968 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mobilisation with movement and exercise, corticosteroid injection, or wait and see for tennis elbow: randomised trial
Published in
British Medical Journal, September 2006
DOI 10.1136/bmj.38961.584653.ae
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leanne Bisset, Elaine Beller, Gwendolen Jull, Peter Brooks, Ross Darnell, Bill Vicenzino

Abstract

To investigate the efficacy of physiotherapy compared with a wait and see approach or corticosteroid injections over 52 weeks in tennis elbow.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 968 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Belgium 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 937 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 148 15%
Student > Bachelor 125 13%
Other 124 13%
Student > Postgraduate 92 10%
Researcher 81 8%
Other 206 21%
Unknown 192 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 440 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 153 16%
Sports and Recreations 63 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 2%
Social Sciences 13 1%
Other 63 7%
Unknown 221 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2024.
All research outputs
#457,147
of 25,528,120 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#5,379
of 64,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#641
of 88,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#9
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,528,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.