| Title |
Environmental and health challenges of the global growth of electronic waste
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11356-012-0923-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qiang Liu, Shu Juan Shi, Li Qing Du, Yan Wang, Jia Cao, Chang Xu, Fei Yue Fan, John P. Giesy, Markus Hecker |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 8 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 8 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 14% |
| Engineering | 6 | 14% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 26% |
| Unknown | 7 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2012.
All research outputs
#6,234,048
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#1,217
of 9,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,262
of 166,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,883 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.