Title |
Diagnostic value of CT-colonography as compared to colonoscopy in an asymptomatic screening population: a meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Radiology, April 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00330-011-2104-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Margriet C. de Haan, Rogier E. van Gelder, Anno Graser, Shandra Bipat, Jaap Stoker |
Abstract |
Previous meta-analyses on CT-colonography included both average and high risk individuals, which may overestimate the diagnostic value in screening. A meta-analysis was performed to obtain the value of CT-colonography for screening. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 143 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 23 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 22 | 15% |
Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
Other | 13 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 9% |
Other | 33 | 22% |
Unknown | 29 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 73 | 50% |
Engineering | 8 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
Other | 14 | 10% |
Unknown | 35 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2015.
All research outputs
#4,671,146
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#704
of 4,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,476
of 109,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,094 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.