| Title |
Routine Use of Surgical Retrograde Transtibial Endovascular Approach for Failed Attempts at Antegrade Recanalization of Chronic Peripheral Artery Total Occlusions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00270-016-1449-4 |
| Authors |
GangZhu Liang, FuXian Zhang, XiaoYun Luo, ChangMing Zhang, YaPing Feng, LuYuan Niu, Huan Zhang, Lu Hu, Hui Zhao, Long Cheng, MingYi Zhang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2016.
All research outputs
#20,337,788
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#2,196
of 2,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#317,033
of 361,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#37
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,372 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.