↓ Skip to main content

Tarik Olcay, Review of Felix Petersen and Zeynep Yanaşmayan (eds.), The Failure of Popular Constitution Making in Turkey: Regressing Towards Constitutional Autocracy

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Constitutional Law, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tarik Olcay, Review of Felix Petersen and Zeynep Yanaşmayan (eds.), The Failure of Popular Constitution Making in Turkey: Regressing Towards Constitutional Autocracy
Published in
International Journal of Constitutional Law, June 2021
DOI 10.1093/icon/moab052
Authors

Tarik Olcay

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2023.
All research outputs
#4,675,868
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Constitutional Law
#238
of 788 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,810
of 460,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Constitutional Law
#8
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 788 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.