| Title |
Explaining, or Sustaining, the Status Quo? The Potentially Self-Fulfilling Effects of ‘Hardwired’ Accounts of Sex Differences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuroethics, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12152-011-9118-4 |
| Authors |
Cordelia Fine |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 102 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Researcher | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 18% |
| Unknown | 16 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 46 | 42% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 18% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 5% |
| Philosophy | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 18 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,096,616
of 25,068,002 outputs
Outputs from Neuroethics
#23
of 434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,261
of 120,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroethics
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,068,002 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.