↓ Skip to main content

Optimizing Non-Antibiotic Treatments for Patients with Acne: A Review

Overview of attention for article published in Dermatology and Therapy, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
patent
29 patents
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Optimizing Non-Antibiotic Treatments for Patients with Acne: A Review
Published in
Dermatology and Therapy, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s13555-016-0138-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Theresa N. Canavan, Edward Chen, Boni E. Elewski

Abstract

Acne is a very common non-infectious skin condition that is frequently treated in dermatological practices. Because acne is often chronic and may persist for years, safe and effective long-term maintenance therapy is often required. Given the increasing frequency of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and the gravity of the consequences of this trend, it behooves dermatologists to maximize use of non-antimicrobial therapy when treating acne. In this review of the literature we present data regarding the efficacy and appropriate use of non-antimicrobial treatments for acne. A variety of topical and oral treatment options exist that can be used in a step-wise manner according to the patients' severity and therapeutic response. Non-antimicrobial treatments can be highly efficacious at controlling acne, especially when used as maintenance therapy. While antibiotics have a role in acne treatment, they should not be used as monotherapy, and lengthy courses of antibiotic use are discouraged.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Taiwan 1 1%
Unknown 82 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Researcher 8 10%
Other 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 28 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 31%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Chemistry 3 4%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 30 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,461,635
of 24,294,722 outputs
Outputs from Dermatology and Therapy
#102
of 861 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,106
of 349,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dermatology and Therapy
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,294,722 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 861 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.