Title |
The Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam: cohort update 2016 and major findings
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Epidemiology, August 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10654-016-0192-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Emiel O. Hoogendijk, Dorly J. H. Deeg, Jan Poppelaars, Marleen van der Horst, Marjolein I. Broese van Groenou, Hannie C. Comijs, H. Roeline W. Pasman, Natasja M. van Schoor, Bianca Suanet, Fleur Thomése, Theo G. van Tilburg, Marjolein Visser, Martijn Huisman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 6 | 32% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 16% |
Luxembourg | 1 | 5% |
United States | 1 | 5% |
France | 1 | 5% |
Canada | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 63% |
Scientists | 5 | 26% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 194 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 43 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 20 | 10% |
Researcher | 19 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
Other | 26 | 13% |
Unknown | 49 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 13% |
Psychology | 20 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 14 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
Other | 43 | 22% |
Unknown | 60 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2019.
All research outputs
#2,370,372
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Epidemiology
#345
of 1,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,360
of 360,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Epidemiology
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,885 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.