↓ Skip to main content

‘Theory of mind’ in animals: ways to make progress

Overview of attention for article published in Synthese, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
Title
‘Theory of mind’ in animals: ways to make progress
Published in
Synthese, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11229-012-0170-3
Authors

Elske van der Vaart, Charlotte K. Hemelrijk

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Unknown 161 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 35 21%
Student > Master 26 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 14%
Researcher 14 8%
Professor 14 8%
Other 32 19%
Unknown 24 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 27%
Psychology 45 27%
Philosophy 7 4%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 30 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2017.
All research outputs
#18,846,947
of 24,026,368 outputs
Outputs from Synthese
#1,931
of 2,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,552
of 183,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthese
#16
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,026,368 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.