| Title |
How do rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) scan faces in a visual paired comparison task?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Animal Cognition, July 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10071-003-0179-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katalin M. Gothard, Cynthia A. Erickson, David G. Amaral |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 137 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 39 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 30 | 20% |
| Unknown | 16 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 27% |
| Psychology | 38 | 26% |
| Neuroscience | 25 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 21 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,356,343
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#932
of 1,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,737
of 52,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,552 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.