| Title |
Evidence against integration of spatial maps in humans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Animal Cognition, May 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10071-006-0022-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bradley R. Sturz, Kent D. Bodily, Jeffrey S. Katz |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 46 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 26% |
| Researcher | 11 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 4 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 25 | 46% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,381,416
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#1,227
of 1,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,915
of 66,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,458 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.