↓ Skip to main content

Contiguity and contingency in action-effect learning

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Research, December 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
206 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Contiguity and contingency in action-effect learning
Published in
Psychological Research, December 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00426-003-0151-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Birgit Elsner, Bernhard Hommel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 3%
United States 4 2%
Germany 3 2%
France 3 2%
Brazil 2 1%
Netherlands 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Finland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 166 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 29%
Student > Master 39 20%
Researcher 30 16%
Professor 10 5%
Student > Bachelor 10 5%
Other 32 17%
Unknown 15 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 125 65%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 6%
Neuroscience 8 4%
Computer Science 7 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 4%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 18 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2016.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Research
#580
of 1,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,706
of 142,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Research
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.