Title |
Sex categorization of conspecific pictures in Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Animal Cognition, April 2006
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10071-006-0020-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Reiko Koba, Akihiro Izumi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Japan | 1 | 2% |
Czechia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 39 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 29% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 10% |
Other | 7 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 33% |
Psychology | 12 | 29% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
Linguistics | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 12% |
Unknown | 6 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,483,389
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#349
of 1,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,474
of 66,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,458 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them