↓ Skip to main content

Spatial encoding by bumblebees (Bombus impatiens) of a reward within an artificial flower array

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Spatial encoding by bumblebees (Bombus impatiens) of a reward within an artificial flower array
Published in
Animal Cognition, January 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10071-005-0011-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dana L. Church, Catherine M. S. Plowright

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 4%
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 41 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 28%
Student > Master 6 13%
Other 2 4%
Professor 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 59%
Psychology 5 11%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Philosophy 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 6 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,381,416
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#1,227
of 1,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,775
of 155,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,458 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.