↓ Skip to main content

Wild redfronted lemurs (Eulemur rufifrons) use social information to learn new foraging techniques

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
Title
Wild redfronted lemurs (Eulemur rufifrons) use social information to learn new foraging techniques
Published in
Animal Cognition, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10071-012-0477-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Viktoria Schnoell, Claudia Fichtel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 5 5%
Hungary 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 104 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 23%
Researcher 18 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 8 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 65 59%
Psychology 14 13%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 11 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,381,416
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#1,227
of 1,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,124
of 159,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#18
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,458 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.