↓ Skip to main content

The role of microglia in brain maintenance: implications for Rett syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Immunology, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of microglia in brain maintenance: implications for Rett syndrome
Published in
Trends in Immunology, October 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.it.2012.10.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Noël C. Derecki, James C. Cronk, Jonathan Kipnis

Abstract

The role of microglia in central nervous system (CNS) pathology has been studied extensively, and more recently, examination of microglia in the healthy brain has yielded important insights into their many functions. It was long assumed that microglia were essentially quiescent cells, unless provoked into activation, which was considered a hallmark of disease. More recently, however, it has become increasingly clear that they are extraordinarily dynamic cells, constantly sampling their environment and adjusting to exquisitely delicate stimuli. Along these lines, our laboratory has identified a new and unexpected role for microglial phagocytosis - or lack thereof - in the pathophysiology of Rett syndrome, a neurodevelopmental disease caused by mutation of the gene encoding methyl-CpG binding protein (MECP)2. We have shown that specific expression of wild type Mecp2 in myeloid cells of Mecp2-null mice is sufficient to arrest major symptoms associated with this devastating disease. This beneficial effect, however, is abolished if phagocytic activity of microglia is inhibited. Here, we discuss microglial origins, the role of microglia in brain development and maintenance, and the phenomenon of microglial augmentation by myeloid progenitor cells in the adult brain. Finally, we address in some detail the beneficial roles of microglia as clinical targets in Rett syndrome and other neurological disorders.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 166 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 24%
Researcher 30 17%
Student > Master 27 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 5%
Other 32 18%
Unknown 25 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 44%
Neuroscience 31 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 1%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 28 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2017.
All research outputs
#23,010,126
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Immunology
#2,625
of 2,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,183
of 202,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Immunology
#23
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.