↓ Skip to main content

The effect of Fe-coverage on the structure, morphology and magnetic properties of α-FeSi2 nanoislands

Overview of attention for article published in Nanotechnology, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of Fe-coverage on the structure, morphology and magnetic properties of α-FeSi2 nanoislands
Published in
Nanotechnology, November 2012
DOI 10.1088/0957-4484/23/49/495603
Pubmed ID
Authors

J K Tripathi, M Garbrecht, W D Kaplan, G Markovich, I Goldfarb

Abstract

Self-assembled α-FeSi(2) nanoislands were formed using solid-phase epitaxy of low (~1.2 ML) and high (~21 ML) Fe coverages onto vicinal Si(111) surfaces followed by thermal annealing. At a resulting low Fe-covered Si(111) surface, we observed in situ, by real-time scanning tunneling microscopy and surface electron diffraction, the entire sequence of Fe-silicide formation and transformation from the initially two-dimensional (2 × 2)-reconstructed layer at 300 °C into (2 × 2)-reconstructed nanoislands decorating the vicinal step-bunch edges in a self-ordered fashion at higher temperatures. In contrast, the silicide nanoislands at a high Fe-covered surface were noticeably larger, more three-dimensional, and randomly distributed all over the surface. Ex situ x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy indicated the formation of an α-FeSi(2) island phase, in an α-FeSi(2){112} // Si{111} orientation. Superconducting quantum interference device magnetometry showed considerable superparamagnetism, with ~1.9 μ(B)/Fe atom at 4 K for the low Fe-coverage, indicating stronger ferromagnetic coupling of individual magnetic moments, as compared to high Fe-coverage, where the calculated moments were only ~0.8 μ(B)/Fe atom. Such anomalous magnetic behavior, particularly for the low Fe-coverage case, is radically different from the non-magnetic bulk α-FeSi(2) phase, and may open new pathways to high-density magnetic memory storage devices.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 5%
Germany 1 5%
Unknown 20 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 7 32%
Physics and Astronomy 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Mathematics 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2012.
All research outputs
#18,320,524
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from Nanotechnology
#3,385
of 4,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,189
of 159,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nanotechnology
#61
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,519 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.