↓ Skip to main content

Sentencing Using Statistical Treatment Rules: What We Don’t Know Can Hurt Us

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Quantitative Criminology, August 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Sentencing Using Statistical Treatment Rules: What We Don’t Know Can Hurt Us
Published in
Journal of Quantitative Criminology, August 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10940-007-9035-1
Authors

Shawn Bushway, Jeffrey Smith

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Chile 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 39 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 19 45%
Psychology 9 21%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 6 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2016.
All research outputs
#3,800,091
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Quantitative Criminology
#161
of 529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,826
of 67,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Quantitative Criminology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them