↓ Skip to main content

Expanding our view of the spine system

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Expanding our view of the spine system
Published in
European Spine Journal, November 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00586-009-1220-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

N. Peter Reeves, Jacek Cholewicki

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 15%
Other 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Master 6 13%
Other 14 30%
Unknown 2 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 47%
Engineering 10 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Sports and Recreations 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 5 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2012.
All research outputs
#18,320,524
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#2,454
of 4,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,374
of 165,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#15
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,598 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.