| Title |
An organisational analysis of the implementation of telecare and telehealth: the whole systems demonstrator
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-12-403 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jane Hendy, Theopisti Chrysanthaki, James Barlow, Martin Knapp, Anne Rogers, Caroline Sanders, Peter Bower, Robert Bowen, Ray Fitzpatrick, Martin Bardsley, Stanton Newman |
| Abstract |
To investigate organisational factors influencing the implementation challenges of redesigning services for people with long term conditions in three locations in England, using remote care (telehealth and telecare). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 31% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Gibraltar | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 69% |
| Scientists | 5 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 214 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 18% |
| Researcher | 36 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 46 | 20% |
| Unknown | 49 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 27 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 16 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 43 | 19% |
| Unknown | 58 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2015.
All research outputs
#2,033,533
of 25,382,035 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#733
of 8,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,403
of 191,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#9
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,035 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.