↓ Skip to main content

Acupuncture for chronic low back pain: protocol for a multicenter, randomized, sham-controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
Title
Acupuncture for chronic low back pain: protocol for a multicenter, randomized, sham-controlled trial
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, June 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-11-118
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jun-Hwan Lee, Hi-Joon Park, Hyangsook Lee, Im Hee Shin, Mi-Yeon Song

Abstract

Use of acupuncture has widely increased in patients with chronic low back pain. However, the evidence supporting its efficacy remains unclear. In this article, we report the design and the protocol of a multi-center randomized sham-controlled trial to treat chronic low back pain. Our goal is to verify the effect of acupuncture on chronic low back pain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 148 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 24%
Student > Master 24 15%
Other 14 9%
Researcher 14 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 22 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 6%
Sports and Recreations 7 4%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 26 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2012.
All research outputs
#15,256,044
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,444
of 4,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,435
of 95,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#23
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,028 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.