↓ Skip to main content

Personality and quality of life: The importance of optimism and goal adjustment

Overview of attention for article published in Quality of Life Research, January 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
245 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
281 Mendeley
Title
Personality and quality of life: The importance of optimism and goal adjustment
Published in
Quality of Life Research, January 2003
DOI 10.1023/a:1023529606137
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carsten Wrosch, Michael F. Scheier

Abstract

This article concerns the relations between personality and quality of life. In the first part, we discuss different conceptualizations of personality and quality of life. We argue that personality affects quality of life by influencing how people approach and react to critical life situations. In the second part, we address the beneficial role played by two individual difference variables in promoting quality of life: dispositional optimism and goal adjustment. Literature is reviewed demonstrating that dispositional optimism facilitates subjective well-being and good health, mediated by a person's coping behaviors. In addition, we discuss studies that examine people who confront unattainable goals. The reported evidence supports the conclusion that individual differences in people's abilities to adjust to unattainable goals are associated with a good quality of life.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 271 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 15%
Student > Bachelor 41 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 13%
Researcher 29 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Other 48 17%
Unknown 65 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 113 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 11%
Social Sciences 16 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 25 9%
Unknown 79 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,852,490
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Quality of Life Research
#106
of 3,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,668
of 136,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality of Life Research
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them