↓ Skip to main content

Early Categorization of Animate/Inanimate Concepts in Young Children with Autism

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, September 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Early Categorization of Animate/Inanimate Concepts in Young Children with Autism
Published in
Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, September 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10882-006-9007-7
Authors

Cynthia R. Johnson, D. H. Rakison

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 3%
United States 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 53 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 24%
Student > Bachelor 10 17%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 14 24%
Unknown 3 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 34 59%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Linguistics 4 7%
Computer Science 4 7%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 5 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2016.
All research outputs
#16,188,009
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities
#174
of 358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,357
of 68,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 358 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.