| Title |
An attentional-adaptation account of spatial negative priming: Evidence from event-related potentials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3758/s13415-013-0237-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiaonan L. Liu, Matthew M. Walsh, Lynne M. Reder |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 10% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 9 | 43% |
| Engineering | 2 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2016.
All research outputs
#16,287,458
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#618
of 974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,968
of 314,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#18
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.