↓ Skip to main content

Acute short-term hyperoxia followed by mild hypoxia does not increase EPO production: resolving the “normobaric oxygen paradox”

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Acute short-term hyperoxia followed by mild hypoxia does not increase EPO production: resolving the “normobaric oxygen paradox”
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, July 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00421-011-2060-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tadej Debevec, Michail E. Keramidas, Barbara Norman, Thomas Gustafsson, Ola Eiken, Igor B. Mekjavic

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 29 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 26%
Other 4 13%
Lecturer 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 11 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 2 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2022.
All research outputs
#15,739,010
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#2,985
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,403
of 127,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#33
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.