↓ Skip to main content

Atypical Social Referencing in Infant Siblings of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
Title
Atypical Social Referencing in Infant Siblings of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10803-012-1518-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauren Cornew, Karen R. Dobkins, Natacha Akshoomoff, Joseph P. McCleery, Leslie J. Carver

Abstract

Social referencing was investigated in 18-month-old siblings of children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD; "high-risk infants"). Infants were exposed to novel toys, which were emotionally tagged via adults' facial and vocal signals. Infants' information seeking (initiation of joint attention with an adult) and their approach/withdrawal behavior toward the toys before versus after the adults' emotional signals was measured. Compared to both typically developing infants and high-risk infants without ASD, infants later diagnosed with ASD engaged in slower information seeking, suggesting that this aspect of referencing may be an early indicator of ASD. High-risk infants, both those who were and those who were not later diagnosed with ASD, exhibited impairments in regulating their behavior based on the adults' emotional signals, suggesting that this aspect of social referencing may reflect an endophenotype for ASD.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 146 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 14%
Researcher 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 27 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 69 46%
Social Sciences 11 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Arts and Humanities 4 3%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 33 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,579,495
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,166
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,825
of 163,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#14
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.