| Title |
Conserving long unburnt vegetation is important for bird species, guilds and diversity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-016-1196-5 |
| Authors |
Robert A. Davis, Tim S. Doherty, Eddie J.B. van Etten, James Q. Radford, Floyd Holmes, Chris Knuckey, Belinda J. Davis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 12 | 40% |
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 80% |
| Scientists | 5 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 21% |
| Researcher | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 18 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 19 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,036,102
of 25,563,770 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#275
of 2,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,228
of 355,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#5
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,563,770 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.