↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of a Respiratory Muscle Biofeedback Procedure–Effects on Heart Rate and Dyspnea

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, September 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of a Respiratory Muscle Biofeedback Procedure–Effects on Heart Rate and Dyspnea
Published in
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, September 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10484-006-9024-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Ritz, Andreas von Leupoldt, Bernhard Dahme

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Student > Master 5 10%
Professor 4 8%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 23%
Sports and Recreations 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 8 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2016.
All research outputs
#16,069,695
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#243
of 355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,712
of 68,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.