↓ Skip to main content

Sensing Senses: Tactile Feedback for the Prevention of Decubitus Ulcers

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Sensing Senses: Tactile Feedback for the Prevention of Decubitus Ulcers
Published in
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, December 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10484-009-9124-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcel Verbunt, Christoph Bartneck

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 81 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 18%
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 17 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 15 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 10%
Neuroscience 6 7%
Psychology 5 6%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 23 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2016.
All research outputs
#16,069,695
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#243
of 355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,348
of 169,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.