↓ Skip to main content

“Probably true” says the expert: how two types of lexical hedges influence students’ evaluation of scientificness

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Psychology of Education, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
“Probably true” says the expert: how two types of lexical hedges influence students’ evaluation of scientificness
Published in
European Journal of Psychology of Education, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10212-014-0243-4
Authors

Monja Thiebach, Elisabeth Mayweg-Paus, Regina Jucks

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 21%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 28%
Linguistics 6 15%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Philosophy 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 11 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2016.
All research outputs
#16,067,622
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Psychology of Education
#256
of 436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,795
of 357,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Psychology of Education
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 436 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.