Title |
The jigsaw technique and self-efficacy of vocational training students: a practice report
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Psychology of Education, January 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10212-011-0091-4 |
Authors |
Céline Darnon, Céline Buchs, Delphine Desbar |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 2% |
Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
Bangladesh | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 86 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 18% |
Student > Master | 15 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
Researcher | 8 | 9% |
Lecturer | 6 | 7% |
Other | 16 | 18% |
Unknown | 20 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 21 | 23% |
Psychology | 12 | 13% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 6% |
Mathematics | 5 | 6% |
Arts and Humanities | 4 | 4% |
Other | 18 | 20% |
Unknown | 25 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2016.
All research outputs
#16,067,622
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Psychology of Education
#256
of 436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,068
of 248,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Psychology of Education
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 436 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.