↓ Skip to main content

Sleep and Eating Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
7 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
Title
Sleep and Eating Disorders
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11920-016-0728-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelly C. Allison, Andrea Spaeth, Christina M. Hopkins

Abstract

Insomnia is related to an increased risk of eating disorders, while eating disorders are related to more disrupted sleep. Insomnia is also linked to poorer treatment outcomes for eating disorders. However, over the last decade, studies examining sleep and eating disorders have relied on surveys, with no objective measures of sleep for anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa, and only actigraphy data for binge eating disorder. Sleep disturbance is better defined for night eating syndrome, where sleep efficiency is reduced and melatonin release is delayed. Studies that include objectively measured sleep and metabolic parameters combined with psychiatric comorbidity data would help identify under what circumstances eating disorders and sleep disturbance produce an additive effect for symptom severity and for whom poor sleep would increase risk for an eating disorder. Cognitive behavior therapy for insomnia may be a helpful addition to treatment of those with both eating disorder and insomnia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 191 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 43 22%
Student > Master 23 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Researcher 13 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 6%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 68 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 37 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Neuroscience 10 5%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 73 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,885,416
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#219
of 1,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,348
of 347,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.